Einstein, a genius
scientist of the 20th century, and central to the new energy physics,
stated that ‘a problem cannot be solved by the same mind
set that created it’. Cancer is a case in point. Cancer
is a dis-ease that stems partly from the products of the mechanistic,
anthropomorphic and exploitative philosophy at the heart of our
culture, which we tend to ignore. Its effective treatment demands
that we see ourselves in a different way and act accordingly.
Medicine is extremely slow to move from a mechanistic
and physical philosophy to a more energetic model, like the Gaian
paradigm that values all life forms as connected. A philosophy
of medicine that is over-reliant on logic and limited mainly to
drugs and surgery is fundamental flawed. Acts of logic always
rely on analysis, that is breaking down a ‘whole’
into its constituent parts, and examining each minutely. Reductionist
approaches fail to see the connectivity and relatedness of all
things. As a result this philosophy is offering us ‘cures’
to cancer that are often as dangerous and destructive as the disease
itself.
Nobel prize-winner Carlo Rubbia maintains that
only a billionth of the world is actually made of matter and the
rest is made of energy. The new sciences are challenging the way
we perceive the world and as a result the way we relate to our
bodies. Dr. K. Scott-Mumby is author of Virtual Medicine and an
allergy specialist in the UK writes:
"Science is proving that we exist as regulated
and informed energy. Disease can now be redefined as a disruption,
cessation or distortion in the information and energy fields.
Its time for medical practitioners to join the party".
Classical science has reached the end of what
it can explain in reductionist terms. Issues such as whether light
is a particle or a wave, or whether or not water has a memory
(an issue central to the ‘proof’ of homeopathy), are
moving modern science to a quantum level that deals with fields
of energy. Medical science is still stuck in a very physical universe,
where the objective is to ‘excise the lump’ almost
regardless of where it came from and individual conditions of
the patient and their experiences.
New sciences such as the chaos theories point
a way forward into handling the complexities of whole systems
that work together, in synergy. Unfortunately our medical systems
and practises are still too often based on philosophy formulated
in medieval times.
Because all interventions in a medical process
have to been ‘proven’ as workable (using scientific
double-blind testing methods) before doctors will recognise their
validity (if they then do the research), medical science mostly
marginalises or ignores healing alternatives that can provide
only ‘anecdotal evidence’. Multiple simultaneous treatments
of different types and ‘levels’ tuned for one patient
are un-testable by a reductionist philosophy and therefore ignored
by mainstream medicine. In addition to this regulatory pressures
force researchers and companies to test their drugs on patients
with advanced cancer - when the dis-ease is much more difficult
to treat and when the chances of success are modest - this means
that potentially useful treatments are discarded as worthless.
Traditional research methodology, or ‘quantitative
research’ is central to science and other methodologies
are not usually acceptable. ‘Qualitative research’
is equally, if not more important at the present time in reference
to cancer. Other medical systems, such as Chinese or Ayurvedic
medicine, Homeopathy or Naturopathy use far subtler tools in both
diagnosis and treatment. They are based on seeing the patient
as a whole being and often use multiple interventions on several
levels, simultaneously in the treatment of dis-ease. Because they
work at the level of an individual patient, and from a different
philosophy of medicine, it is almost impossible to analyse them
with the tools of reductionist science.
Our present rash of immune attacking diseases
calls for a different kind of response than just drugs and surgery.
A new medicine that combines established scientific excellence
with traditional, alternative and natural treatments is needed.
One that recognises humans as feeling, vibrant, energetic, spiritual
beings as well as physical and mental. There are dramatic developments
in the treatment of cancer using energy systems, but information
on this is actually suppressed. There is a movement towards an
integrated medicine as more orthodox practitioners are starting
to join in, led mostly by their patients.
From an energy point of view, when the human
body is weak or unbalanced it oscillates at different frequencies
than when it is healthy. This less harmonious frequency shows
a state of cellular, energetic imbalance in the body. The physical
body that is weakened in this way often needs help to shift to
the needed frequency, which strengthens the immune system.
Some experienced medical doctors can make an
intuitive diagnosis based on experience and can sometimes tell
in a second or so what ails their patient. Posture, skin condition,
nail, teeth and tongue all give clues, but experienced doctors
may also intuitively pick up clues about their patients from energy
and vibrational levels in a similar way to a gardener tending
plants or a wild animal hunting its prey.
But modern doctors simply do not have the time
for the level of attention given in many complementary and alternative
therapies. This is one of the reasons alternatives are more popular
than ever. Professional detachment is an essential part of the
doctors’ repertoire and it protects them in part from the
huge amount of need they encounter in day to day work.
Given the track record of orthodox medical science
into whole person medicine, it may well be another 200 years or
so before it is able to assimilate the new quantum sciences in
relation to the human body. For those people with cancer now,
there are a deliberately limited range of options available from
orthodox medicine.
This is an extract from 'Don't Get Cancer'a new
ebook available only at: http://www.simonthescribe.co.uk/don'tget1.html
|